![]() |
Request to Complete Questionnaire for Impact Study on the Implementation of CEDAW
(Masimanyane Women's Support Centre, 27/10/98) | |||||||
|
The impact study is important to South Africa because of the contribution
it will make to the advancement of women's Human Rights. This contribution
and specifically its focus on Violence Against Women, are important
concerns that need to be addressed. They need to be accounted for by the
government for it is ultimately responsible for ensuring that women's Human
Rights are upheld.
According to the guidelines as produced by the International Women's Rights
Project, the CEDAW impact study has been designed to "measure the
implementation, and lack thereof, of the UN human rights treaties - the
cornerstone of the global rights legal system - by beginning with examining
CEDAW." This creates tools for governments and NGOs alike to effectively
address human rights issues. This study will "identify practical means to
improve the reporting and monitoring processes relevant to member
countries, treaty bodies and constituencies."
Masimanyane is interested in obtaining information on all aspects of
women's human rights in relation to CEDAW. Coinciding with the project's
agenda, Masimanyane does agree that it is "imperative that the treaty
system become a meaningful bulwark for the rule of law and against the
disintegration of the human rights legal framework. For this to happen, we
must have more practical knowledge about what works and what doesn't work
in the use of treaties, beginning with CEDAW."
Information submitted in the final report will be acknowledged. In addition, the data collected in this pilot study will be the foundation for making meaningful comparisons about the
effectiveness of CEDAW.
Please emphasize the importance of this work.
We require all information by Thursday, 5 November 1998.
Lesley Ann Foster
1. Describe the problems / solutions for NGO's in the use of CEDAW, such as
efforts and methods employed to remove country reservations, education
needs, advocacy needs.
1. What was the motivation for ratification? How was this motivation
communicated - by written announcement, media coverage, spoken statements
(on record or unofficial). Please include dates, citations and clippings
wherever possible.
2. Describe the steps taken in your country towards ratification.
3. Following ratification, how did you learn that your country had in fact
ratified CEDAW? What follow-up measures were taken by the government, by
others? Please describe as fully as possible.
1. What is the level of NGO participation in the preparation of state
parties' reports?
2. Describe any NGO "shadow reports", including which NGO's were involved
in their preparation. Please include a copy wherever possible.
3. Have NGO's received any guidelines and training on CEDAW? Who provided
this? What have the results been?
4. What are the areas of information provided by NGO's that were included
in the member country report to the UN? Was anything provided / excluded?
Please describe and provide samples wherever possible.
1. Describe the use of / reference to CEDAW in: courts, media,
constitutional and legislative initiatives, non-profit sector, or by
advocates for development policy reform.
2. Are you aware of the CEDAW concluding comments in response to the
country report(s)? Have the CEDAW Committee concluding comments been
implemented? How? Please provide samples where ever possible.
3. Are there any other ways that CEDAW has been used, i.e. interpreting a
point of public policy or administrative law?
4. Describe any conscious effort taken to incorporate CEDAW in domestic
legislation as opposed to, for example, issuing the Convention to create
clarity in domestic legislation / tool for statutory interpretation.
5. Describe Government / institutional arrangements in implementing CEDAW:
Who / what are assigned as key implementers? What are the strengths /
weaknesses of these arrangements?
6. Identify who / which category of people is using the Convention in any
particular way, for what purposes?
|
||||||||