Memorandum to the Minister of Justice: Women's Rights Campaign
UN Declaration of Human Rights - 50th Anniversary
Preamble
The South African government signed and ratified the Convention for the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in 1995.
[Click here for the NGO CEDAW shadow report and here for the government report.] To comply with the commitments set out in CEDAW on violence against women in particular articles 1, 2, 3 and recommendations 12 and 19 the South African government is obliged at an international level to guarantee the right of women to be protected against violence in its policies, plans of action and programmes.
South African Women's rights are guaranteed in the new constitution. Every person is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law (section 9, Equality). Every person has inherent dignity and has the right to have their dignity respected and protected (section 10, Human Dignity). Every person has the right to freedom, which includes the right to bodily and psychological integrity . This includes the right to security in and control over their body (section 12, Freedom and Security of the person).
Constitutional rights have however, to be translated into legal and practical rights for women who have been abused.
One piece of legislation which seeks to give substance to the rights enshrined in the Constitution, is the Prevention of Family Violence Act, Act 133 of 1993. In terms of this Act, women are entitled to obtain interdicts to prevent family violence.
In order to achieve the effective implementation of these rights, we require the full and unwavering support of the Minister of Justice, to ensure that officials entrusted with the important task of enforcing the act, do so.
We demand:
1. The state pay sheriffs fees for all domestic violence interdicts.
Violence against women is linked to the economic disempowerment of women. Many women are prevented from leaving abusive relationships due to their financial dependence on the abuser.
The state has made a remedy available to women to protect themselves from domestic violence through the Prevention of Family Violence Act. However, this Act is rendered useless when women are required to pay the sheriff's fees, which they cannot afford, for serving the interdict on the abuser. The state has a duty to protect women from violence, therefore in cases where a woman lacks the resources to obtain an interdict, the state has a duty to cover the costs of service of the interdict.
2. The police arrest abusers when a breach of the interdict is reported.
In terms of the Prevention of Family Violence Act, a police officer is required to arrest an abuser as soon as a breach of the interdict is reported. Many police officers however, exercise an unauthorized discretion and either warn an abuser without arresting him, or insisting that a woman lay a criminal charge of assault before they arrest the abuser.
This is unacceptable behaviour on the part of a police service which has identified domestic violence as a priority crime. In addition, we urge the Independent Complaints Directorate to pursue all investigations against police officers who do not arrest abusers when a breach is reported.
3.The courts issue all requested interdicts instead of less effective restraining orders/peace orders.
In terms of the Prevention of Family Violence Act, a certain category of abused person is entitled to obtain an interdict. However, in many instances where women request interdicts, clerks of the court are issuing less effective peace orders. This is based on a personal aversion to issuing too many interdicts. This too is an unauthorized discretion exercised by the clerks.
We demand that where a woman qualifies for an interdict in terms of the Act, that clerks immediately issue these interdicts.
4. The state assist abused women to access legal aid.
Women coming from abusive backgrounds are often not aware of their legal rights and have little access to financial resources. They are often unable to obtain legal advice and assistance.
Clerks who come into contact with abused women have the opportunity to assist women to access legal aid. We urge that they be required to provide women with information as to their legal rights.
5. The state undertake training for all relevant departmental personnel for improved service delivery.
Women using the courts often suffer secondary victimization because the court personnel do not understand the issues around violence against women. Insensitive and uninformed behaviour by court personnel further traumatize the abused women. Increasingly women are reluctant to enforce their rights through court procedures.
We urge the implementation of training for all law enforcement agents as set out in Justice Vision 2000.
6. Legislation for perpetrator who stalk their partners be addressed.
There is no legislation which addresses the problem of stalking. Most women report being stalked after separation or even divorced and no legislation is in place to assist them in this regard.
Appendix
Article 1,2 and 3.
Recommendations 12 and 19.